Overview

FARKOSTTEKNIK & SOLIDMEKANIK

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

13.6

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

70.5 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

84.5 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is moderate, 70.5%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

FARKOSTTEKNIK & SOLIDMEKANIK

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 7.2 7.1 6.7 5.0 2.9 3.1 7.6 39.5 82.0% 0.9
Article, other NA 0.3 0.2 NA NA NA 0.4 0.9 44.4% 0.6
Conference paper, peer review 3.7 4.5 5.7 3.1 3.2 0.9 3.3 24.5 52.0% 0.7
Conference paper, other 0.9 1.8 2.0 1.6 1.6 2.3 1.3 11.6 15.8% 0.5
Chapter in book NA NA NA NA 0.2 NA 0.8 1.0 75.0% 1.0
Proceeding (editor) NA NA 0.3 NA NA NA NA 0.3 0.0% 1.0
Report 0.1 NA NA NA 0.3 0.5 0.2 1.2 0.0% 0.0
Doctoral thesis NA NA NA 3.0 NA 1.0 NA 4.0 0.0% 0.0
Licentiate thesis 2.0 1.0 NA NA NA 1.0 NA 4.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 18 16 17 13 8 8 15 95 82.1% 1
Article, other NA 1 1 NA NA NA 2 4 50.0% 1
Conference paper, peer review 10 10 12 7 8 2 8 57 50.9% 1
Conference paper, other 4 6 7 4 4 5 3 33 12.1% 1
Chapter in book NA NA NA NA 1 NA 1 2 50.0% 1
Proceeding (editor) NA NA 1 NA NA NA NA 1 0.0% 1
Report 1 NA NA NA 1 1 1 4 0.0% 0
Doctoral thesis NA NA NA 3 NA 1 NA 4 0.0% 0
Licentiate thesis 2 1 NA NA NA 1 NA 4 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

FARKOSTTEKNIK & SOLIDMEKANIK

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 4.9 8.6 1.8 1.6 32.4%
2015 7.6 9.1 1.2 4.5 59.2%
2016 10.4 13.2 1.3 5.5 53.5%
2017 4.6 7.4 1.6 1.4 30.7%
2018 6.0 10.9 1.8 3.1 51.7%
Total 33.5 49.3 1.5 16.1 48.3%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 15.5 0.66 0.7 4.3%
2015-2017 14.7 0.58 0.3 2.3%
2016-2018 11.7 0.66 0.5 4.3%
2017-2019 9.0 0.75 0.5 5.5%
Total 24.5 0.70 1.2 4.8%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 12 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 44.9%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 24 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 78.3%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

FARKOSTTEKNIK & SOLIDMEKANIK

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 15.5 1.03 1.9 12.3%
2015-2017 14.7 1.02 2.2 14.9%
2016-2018 11.7 0.97 1.3 11.0%
2017-2019 9.0 1.04 1.2 13.0%
2018-2020 11.7 1.08 1.3 11.6%
Total 31.1 1.03 3.7 11.8%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 24 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 78.3%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

FARKOSTTEKNIK & SOLIDMEKANIK

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 40 21 52.5% 10 25.0%
2015-2017 37 15 40.5% 12 32.4%
2016-2018 32 14 43.8% 12 37.5%
2017-2019 23 7 30.4% 11 47.8%
2018-2020 26 5 19.2% 14 53.8%
Total 76 28 36.8% 29 38.2%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 23 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 80.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
China 4 4 0 0 0 2.3
Spain 9 8 1 0 0 2.0
United Kingdom 6 5 1 0 0 2.0
Norway 6 6 0 0 0 1.6
Austria 4 4 0 0 0 1.0
Japan 3 2 1 0 0 0.9
Netherlands 5 4 1 0 0 0.9
Italy 3 2 1 0 0 0.8
Germany 3 2 1 0 0 0.8
Turkey 1 1 0 0 0 0.7
Australia 3 3 0 0 0 0.6
France 2 1 1 0 0 0.6
Ireland 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Switzerland 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Volvo Car Corp Company Sweden 13 13 0 0 0 6.2
Bombardier Company Sweden 17 16 1 0 0 5.5
Norwegian University of Science and Technology University Norway 6 6 0 0 0 1.6
Beijing Institute of Technology University China 2 2 0 0 0 1.4
Swedish Transport Administration Other Public Sweden 4 4 0 0 0 1.3
University of Navarra University Spain 5 5 0 0 0 1.2
Chalmers University of Technology University Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 1.0
University of Huddersfield University United Kingdom 2 2 0 0 0 1.0
CAF Company Spain 4 3 1 0 0 0.8
Politecnico di Milano University Italy 3 2 1 0 0 0.8
China Electronics Technology Group Corporation (CETC) Company China 1 1 0 0 0 0.8
Chemnitz University of Technology University Germany 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Adana Alparslan Turkes Sci & Technol Univ NA Turkey 1 1 0 0 0 0.7
University of Tokyo University Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.6
Tikab Strukturmekanik AB Company Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
University of Seville University Spain 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
CEIT Company Spain 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Cranfield University University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Trinity College, Dublin University Ireland 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Graz University Austria 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
University of Le Mans University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Swerea Institute Sweden 2 1 1 0 0 0.4
Central Queensland University University Australia 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute Institute Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.4
Delft University of Technology University Netherlands 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) Institute Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Scania AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
SNC-Lavalin Group Inc.  Company Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth Other Public Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Austrian Tribology Society Institute Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Virtual Vehicle Res Ctr Institute Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL) Institute Netherlands 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
Eindhoven University of Technology University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
HAN University of Applied Sciences University College Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
ZF Automot NA Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
RailMeasurement Ltd Company United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Queensland University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Sheffield University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Vienna University of Technology University Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Talgo Company Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Castilla–La Mancha (UCLM) University Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Japan Automobile Research Institute (JARI) Other Japan 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Swedish Energy Agency Other Public Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Volvo AB Company Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Alstom SA Company Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Bombardier Company Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Bombardier Company Switzerland 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Deutsche Bahn AG (DB AG) Company Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
French Institute of Science and Technology for Transport Institute France 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Hitachi Company Italy 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Rail Safety and Standards Board (RSSB) Company United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Siemens Company Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Technical University of Berlin University Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Open Access

FARKOSTTEKNIK & SOLIDMEKANIK

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 17 5 0 1 4 0 12 29.4%
2015 16 4 0 0 4 0 12 25.0%
2016 27 8 1 3 3 1 19 29.6%
2017 14 6 1 0 4 1 8 42.9%
2018 9 1 1 0 0 0 8 11.1%
2019 8 5 1 2 2 0 3 62.5%
2020 22 9 3 3 3 0 13 40.9%
Total 113 38 7 9 20 2 75 33.6%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

FARKOSTTEKNIK & SOLIDMEKANIK

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 8.9 65.2 7.3 3.4 37.8%
2015 10.2 53.4 5.2 3.4 32.9%
2016 12.5 58.5 4.7 5.4 43.7%
2017 6.3 33.6 5.3 1.0 15.1%
2018 7.1 21.9 3.1 4.0 55.8%
2019 3.5 26.8 7.6 0.2 5.7%
2020 12.4 20.7 1.7 7.4 60.3%
Total 60.8 280.1 4.6 24.7 40.7%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 9 (full counted) publications with moderate Scopus coverage (at least 62.8%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 27.0 0.80 2.1 7.6%
2015-2017 25.6 0.61 0.6 2.3%
2016-2018 24.3 0.59 0.8 3.1%
2017-2019 16.4 0.75 1.2 7.1%
Total 43.4 0.78 3.2 7.5%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 39 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 79.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 19.4 1.59 14.2 73.2%
2015-2017 18.5 1.44 12.2 65.8%
2016-2018 15.1 1.44 9.3 61.3%
2017-2019 10.5 1.61 6.5 61.9%
2018-2020 17.4 1.59 10.3 59.4%
Total 41.4 1.55 26.5 64.1%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 39 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 79.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 78 33 42.3% 17 21.8%
2015-2017 72 27 37.5% 20 27.8%
2016-2018 66 24 36.4% 23 34.8%
2017-2019 46 13 28.3% 21 45.7%
2018-2020 55 11 20.0% 26 47.3%
Total 150 48 32.0% 50 33.3%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 46 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 84%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row